Crunchy Kickoff Mozzarella Sticks: Game-Day Goodness
Vegan Maple Sesame Game Day Cauliflower “Wings”
You’ve Gotta Try this in February 2024
Choosing Connection: A BC Family Day Pledge to Prioritize Presence Over Plans
Embracing Plant-Based Living this Veganuary and Beyond
Heal Your Gut, Naturally
Inviting the Steller’s Jay to Your Garden
6 Budget-friendly Holiday Decor Pieces
Dream Home: $8 Million for a Modern Surprise
Protected: The 2024 Spring Road Trip Destination You Won’t Want To Miss
The People’s Open Just One Reason to Visit Some Classic Scottsdale Golf Courses
Scottsdale In the Fast Lane
10 Places to See Holiday Lights in Metro Vancouver
Vancouver Adventures: Our Picks for December
What to Watch This Week: December 3 to 8
Are you getting the most from your expertly cultivated and perfectly aged wine collection?
The Ultimate Holiday Gift Guide for Him
The Ultimate Holiday Gift Guide for Her
A case for reversing massive budget cuts to adult cultural industries.
In the provincial budget released March 8, 2010, it was announced that funding from the BC government would be eliminated for arts, culture and sports groups that deliver services to adults, although some programs will remain in place for youth and children.
The changes affect hundreds of non-profit organizations and charities across the province and happen against a backdrop of huge reductions in funding for arts and culture generally.
In my view this approach connects to some commonly held biases around cultural industries that stand in the way of broad understanding of art and culture as a real industry, preventing for example recognition that the sector is a huge economic generator in the province.
Kate Armstrong has a bone to pick with the BC government over the recent arts funding cuts
If the art and culture sector has value, why are we not supporting it and promoting it through governmental channels, the way we support and promote other industries? And if art and culture have no value, why is it something we find important for our children?
What would it look like if the province cut investment in other sectors except as they pertained to the activities of children and youth? Let us imagine…
Provincial support in British Columbia for programs relating to the wood industry will be suspended in favour of programs that support the production of toys and small playhouses with a maximum width of 6’ x 6’. (Some exceptions may apply for large children.)
2. Business and entrepreneurship
Traditional supports for international finance activity in British Columbia have been replaced by a groundbreaking program to develop and refine knowledge of international finance among children in the province.
Roads designed to transport adults as well as goods intended for use by adults will cease to be maintained in the provincial government’s infrastructure plan. Only trade routes designated to move educational items for children and youth (K-12) will be supported. Programs will remain in place to develop and maintain roadworks in schoolyards that show children how to safely navigate intersections.
Funding toward infrastructure in the province will be halted in favour of education programs for youth and children that articulate the value of infrastructure.
Funding in the sector of Community Safety and Law Enforcement in the province of British Columbia will be eliminated in favour of programs that support childhood dreams of becoming a policeman.
For more information about cuts to the arts in BC, visit Stop BC Arts Cuts.
Kate Armstrong is an artist, writer and independent curator. Her interdisciplinary practice merges networked media, written forms and urban experiences. She has lectured and exhibited internationally, producing events and participating in exhibitions at venues including Akbank Sanat (Istanbul, Turkey), the Museum of the City of Skopje (Skopje, Macedonia), ISEA 2006 (San Jose, California), Eyebeam Atelier (New York City) and Tate Britain.
Website | Email | Twitter